reviews

reviews

reviews — a ready-to-use text prompt for Writing & Content. Copy it and paste into ChatGPT, Claude, or your preferred AI assistant.

How to use it

Copy the prompt as-is.
Paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, or your preferred AI assistant.

Pairs well with English Translator and Improver — try running them back to back.

Optional: use the “Additional context” field to add extra details, tone, constraints, or background the AI should know about, then include it when you copy the prompt.

Optional: pick a “Prompting Technique” below (Few-shot, Chain-of-Thought, Self-Consistency, Generate Knowledge, Directional Stimulus, Meta Prompting) to wrap this prompt with a proven prompting strategy.

The base prompt

Objective: Summarize many reviews

1. **Process available reviews**

* Note the number of reviews and remember that value as "number_reviews"
* Overall rating
* Rating distribution if visible
* It's possible there aren't any reviews, for example if a product is new or out of stock. If that's the case, don't include any review analysis in your response.

2. **Identify repeated patterns**

* Common positive themes
* Common complaints
* Frequency of each theme

3. **Support themes with evidence**

* Representative quotes for major themes
* Specific examples that illustrate points

4. **Evaluate trustworthiness**

* Do reviews seem genuine?
* Suspicious patterns (all 5-star, generic language)
* Verified purchase indicators

5. **Summarize overall sentiment**

* Would most reviewers buy again?
* Who loves it vs. who hates it?

6. **Handling exceptions**

Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.

Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.

7. **Final response**

If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:

* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
If number_reviews is 0, your response should mention that there aren't any reviews and you should jump to the follow-on question.

**Overview:** [X] reviews, [Y] average rating

**Pros**

| Theme | Frequency | Example |
| :---: | :---: | :---: |

**Cons**

| Theme | Frequency | Example |
| :---: | :---: | :---: |

**Quality of reviews:** [Do they seem genuine?]

**Bottom line:** [Would most reviewers buy again?]

8. **Follow-up questions**

If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

Want it filled in and enhanced? Use the builder →

Objective: Summarize many reviews 1. **Process available reviews** * Note the number of reviews and remember that value as "number_reviews" * Overall rating * Rating distribution if visible * It's possible there aren't any reviews, for example if a product is new or out of stock. If that's the case, don't include any review analysis in your response. 2. **Identify repeated patterns** * Common positive themes * Common complaints * Frequency of each theme 3. **Support themes with evidence** * Representative quotes for major themes * Specific examples that illustrate points 4. **Evaluate trustworthiness** * Do reviews seem genuine? * Suspicious patterns (all 5-star, generic language) * Verified purchase indicators 5. **Summarize overall sentiment** * Would most reviewers buy again? * Who loves it vs. who hates it? 6. **Handling exceptions** Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should * respond as best you can and * acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request. Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user. 7. **Final response** If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including: * Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized). * Favor simple sentences that use common words If number_reviews is 0, your response should mention that there aren't any reviews and you should jump to the follow-on question. **Overview:** [X] reviews, [Y] average rating **Pros** | Theme | Frequency | Example | | :---: | :---: | :---: | **Cons** | Theme | Frequency | Example | | :---: | :---: | :---: | **Quality of reviews:** [Do they seem genuine?] **Bottom line:** [Would most reviewers buy again?] 8. **Follow-up questions** If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.

English Translator and Improver

Storyteller

Football Commentator

Screenwriter